The Most Common Product Data Mistakes—and the Smarter Way to Fix Them

In the complex landscape of regulatory product classification, ensuring accurate and complete information is paramount. However, common errors frequently lead to product rejections, posing significant challenges for businesses. This article delves into prevalent mistakes in regulatory classifications, the challenges inherent in the current processes, and the advancements introduced by SmarterX's Smarter-1 API to enhance data accuracy.

Common Errors in Regulatory Classifications

1. Incorrect Battery Specifications: A frequent error involves misreporting battery cell counts. Users often input incorrect values due to a lack of understanding of what constitutes a battery cell count. This misclassification can lead to regulatory non-compliance and potential safety hazards.
   
   
2. Inaccurate Formulated Product Ranges: For formulated products, it's essential to provide precise concentration ranges of ingredients. A common mistake is entering broad ranges like "0-100%" instead of the actual specific range or number. This lack of specificity can hinder proper classification and regulatory approval.
   
   
3. Omission of Component Details: In products like ceiling fans, users often list only the parent product, neglecting to include child components. This omission can lead to incomplete classifications and potential safety oversights.
   
   
4. Misclassification of Product Forms: An example is sheet masks being labeled as "free liquid" when they should be classified as "liquid absorbed in solid." Such misclassifications can affect regulatory compliance and product handling requirements.
   
   

We ran an analysis of 2,072 rejected products that we’ve processed, and found that the top three causes of rejection included missing components (23%), incorrect item type (9.5%), and missing/incorrect flashpoints (7%). Other causes of rejection included incorrect quantity, pH levels, ingredients, watt hours, safety data sheets (SDS), concentration ranges, battery type, and more.

‍

These errors underscore the critical need for precise and comprehensive data entry in regulatory classifications.

Challenges with the Existing Process

The current regulatory classification process heavily relies on manual data entry, which is prone to human error. Approximately 89% of products have complete information for classification, leaving a 10.5% gap of products with incomplete or incorrect data. This gap can lead to delays in product approvals, increased costs, and potential market entry barriers.

The Impact of Inaccurate Data on Regulatory Compliance

Inaccurate data entry can have severe consequences, including non-compliance with regulations, product recalls, and legal liabilities. For instance, misclassifying a product's chemical composition can lead to improper handling and storage, posing safety risks. Additionally, incorrect classification can result in financial penalties and damage to a company's reputation.

Advancements with SmarterX's Smarter-1

SmarterX's Smarter-1 addresses these challenges by automating the data collection process, thereby reducing the reliance on manual input. With Smarter-1, the issue of missing supplier information is mitigated, increasing the completeness of product data from 89% to nearly 100%. This enhancement ensures more accurate classifications, streamlined regulatory compliance, and a reduction in product rejections.

Conclusion

Accurate regulatory classification is essential for compliance and market success. By understanding common errors and leveraging advanced solutions like Smarter-1, businesses can improve data accuracy, reduce rejections, and navigate the regulatory landscape more effectively.

‍